dispassion or love?

Non-dual teachers pointed to awareness as synonymous with love, but that was not my experience. It irritated me when they spoke of this love–and of course, I berated myself for “not getting it.” For a few years after immersion in these teachings, I experienced the ground of awareness as dispassionate–clear, transparent, open, awake–and devoid of feeling.

I desperately wanted personal love to be true, to be enough, even at the cost of suffering. Eventually, I discovered that I lacked a deeper understanding of love–but if you had tried to tell me that, I would have vehemently denied it. Over time, and through a difficult and excruciatingly painful period in my life, it became clear to me that what I sought in personal love–even in the midst of a unique and wonderful marriage–simply wasn’t possible. What I sought, longed and cried out for, was not in the realm of the personal.

Those teachers were pointing to the truth, but I had to experience directly in order to surrender to that truth: the ground of awareness is devoid of feeling as we normally experience it in our bodies. As personal love dissolves, a deeper love is revealed–the intimacy of no separation. Standing side by side, the same, the only, awareness shines.

© Amrita Skye Blaine, 2012
photo credit: Panhala Poetry

1 Comment

Filed under Musings

One response to “dispassion or love?

  1. Alexandra Hart

    Again, Amrita — very well said. I suspect that is what the non-embodied state is and why being embodied is so compelling as a vehicle for learning.

I welcome comments and discussion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s